Categories: United States

NHL Overrules Referees, Rescinds Controversial Major Penalty on Avalanche Star Nathan MacKinnon

NHL Overrules Referees, Rescinds Controversial Major Penalty on Avalanche Star Nathan MacKinnon

The National Hockey League has officially rescinded a controversial five-minute major penalty and a 10-minute game misconduct assessed to Colorado Avalanche star Nathan MacKinnon, a decision confirmed by the league on Thursday, March 12, 2026. This reversal comes after an incident on Tuesday, March 10, 2026, during a high-stakes game against the Edmonton Oilers. MacKinnon himself confirmed the league’s decision to the media before the Avalanche’s subsequent game against the Seattle Kraken.

The Controversial Play: A Breakdown of the Collision with Goalie Connor Ingram

The contentious play unfolded in the Avalanche’s 4-3 loss to the Oilers, involving a collision between MacKinnon and Edmonton goaltender Connor Ingram. MacKinnon was initially penalized for goaltender interference, a call that forced Ingram to leave the game. However, the NHL’s subsequent review provided a different narrative. The league’s determination was that MacKinnon was not solely responsible for the contact; rather, he was pushed into Ingram by Oilers defenseman Darnell Nurse. Avalanche coach Jared Bednar vehemently defended his player from the outset, arguing that MacKinnon was a “victim of physics” in the play, not a reckless attacker. “I really don’t give a crap if their goalie’s hurt. That’s on their D-men, not on our guy,” Bednar stated after the initial penalty call, reflecting the team’s immediate frustration. Teammate Cale Makar also weighed in, asserting, “Nate’s got some of the best spatial awareness in the league. He’s not going to cut into the goalie like that.”

The Ruling’s Impact: How Rescinding the Penalty Affects MacKinnon and the Avalanche

The NHL’s decision to overturn the major penalty carries significant ramifications for MacKinnon and the Avalanche, extending far beyond the immediate outcome of the Oilers game. Crucially, by rescinding the penalty, MacKinnon’s “physical infraction” count is reset to zero. This reset is vital because a second major penalty for a similar infraction within a 41-game window automatically triggers a one-game suspension. With the league acknowledging that “mistakes happen” in officiating, as reported by The Denver Post, MacKinnon avoids the threat of an automatic suspension that would undoubtedly impact the Avalanche’s playoff push. His clear slate allows him to continue his dominant performance without the shadow of an impending suspension for a potentially unavoidable play. Despite the penalty being overturned, the outcome of the 4-3 loss to the Oilers remains unchanged. However, MacKinnon quickly put the controversy behind him, demonstrating his elite form in the subsequent game against Seattle on March 12, where he scored his 44th goal of the season and recorded a four-point night, further solidifying his MVP-caliber campaign.

Coach and Player Reactions: Jared Bednar and Teammates Defend MacKinnon

The initial penalty call against Nathan MacKinnon sparked immediate and fiery reactions from the Colorado Avalanche bench. Coach Jared Bednar was particularly vocal in his defense of his star forward. His post-game comments, “I really don’t give a crap if their goalie’s hurt. That’s on their D-men, not on our guy,” underscored his conviction that MacKinnon was an innocent party in the collision. Bednar consistently maintained that MacKinnon’s contact with Oilers goaltender Connor Ingram was not intentional or reckless, but rather an unavoidable consequence of being pushed into the net by Darnell Nurse. This perspective was echoed by MacKinnon’s teammates. Defenseman Cale Makar, one of the league’s premier players himself, offered a strong endorsement of MacKinnon’s playmaking instincts and awareness. “Nate’s got some of the best spatial awareness in the league. He’s not going to cut into the goalie like that,” Makar stated, highlighting MacKinnon’s reputation as a clean, skilled player. The unified front from the Avalanche coaching staff and players likely contributed to the league’s thorough review, which ultimately vindicated MacKinnon and reaffirmed their assessment of the incident. The reversal not only cleared MacKinnon’s record but also validated the team’s firm belief in their player’s conduct and the unfairness of the initial call.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What was Nathan MacKinnon’s initial penalty?
A: Nathan MacKinnon was initially assessed a five-minute major penalty for goaltender interference and a 10-minute game misconduct.

Q: Why was the penalty rescinded by the NHL?
A: The NHL’s review determined that MacKinnon was pushed into Oilers goaltender Connor Ingram by defenseman Darnell Nurse, rather than intentionally initiating contact.

Q: What is the significance of the penalty being rescinded for MacKinnon?
A: Rescinding the penalty resets MacKinnon’s “physical infraction” count to zero, preventing an automatic one-game suspension that would occur if he received a second major penalty for a similar infraction within a 41-game window.

What are your thoughts on the NHL’s decision to overrule the on-ice officials in this instance? Was justice served, or should the original call have stood?


🛍️ Trending Deal: Shop the latest Hockey Skates on Amazon ➔
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Related Topics: NHL, Nathan MacKinnon, Colorado Avalanche

Virally Trendy

Share
Published by
Virally Trendy

Recent Posts

Brad Pitt’s Son Maddox Drops ‘Pitt’ From His Name in Film Credits, Following Siblings’ Lead

Another one of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's children has dropped 'Pitt' from their name.…

3 hours ago

AC Milan Grinds Out Victory Over Lazio in Fiery Serie A Clash Marked by Three Red Cards

Absolute chaos in Rome! AC Milan edges past Lazio 1-0 in a match that saw…

3 hours ago

Rennes and Lille Battle in Crucial Ligue 1 Showdown at Roazhon Park

It's match day! Rennes takes on Lille in a huge Ligue 1 clash with European…

3 hours ago

Ruth Jones Reveals Why She Rejected ‘Celebrity Traitors’: “I’d Rather Just Watch It”

No Traitors cloak for Nessa! Ruth Jones confirms she was asked to do 'Celebrity Traitors'…

3 hours ago

Purdue University Death: 19-Year-Old’s Cause of Death Ruled Asphyxia, Manner Still Pending

Tragedy at Purdue: A 19-year-old found in the Physics Building died from asphyxia, coroner confirms.…

3 hours ago

🔴 LIVE: Top Search Trends in India (March 16, 2026)

Sabalenka's Indian Wells journey is gripping India! 🎾🏆 Will she overcome her rival in a…

5 hours ago

This website uses cookies.